"But the gallery and X-Pro3 sensor make it look much better than it really is ". The zoom range is well spaced, I use both of these lenses the min focus is far better on the beercan. 360 panorama photo from Bavaria by Heinz Bruckschloegl. At Amazon Spain it costs 675 (sold BY Amazon). Sign in or create an account to access your information. (purchased for $126), reviewed April 19th, 2013 Here we collect sample pictures taken with the lens Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR . Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Aspherical IF Macro AF ~~470 i think everyone would agree that the 70-300mm VR is the better of the two lenses, but it is substantially more expensive. Thankfully Tamron has a 28-75mm which has a close focusing ability but unfortunately only at the wide end which shows the shadow of the lens in many shots. (purchased for $260), reviewed November 6th, 2008 If we haven't said it enough through this review, lenses that used to cost this much didn't have much to offer other than the savings in the wallet. With a real improvement in optical characteristics from its predecessor design and the addition of VR image stabilization technology, you can't do much better for the price. (purchased for $240), reviewed January 15th, 2009 Nikon's ultimate travel lens, the 18-200mm is also equipped with VR image stabilization technology; however, it's a newer version, VRII, able to make photos at shutter speeds four stops slower than required without stabilization, rather than the 55-200mm's two stop improvement. I shot extensively with the 28-85mm on FF digital and film, a good solid lens yet he rates it as meh. For a full list of the technical specifications please refer to the product manual. Although the lens retails for $350 MSRP, it can be purchased at a fraction of that price when bought as part of the Z50 two-lens kit. The 55-300mm /4.5-5.6G ED VR was introduced in August 2010 as a new telephoto zoom lens companion to its 18-55mm wide-angle zoom lens. The Nikon 55-200mm VR II is significantly better for hand-held Some nice photos there. It's a tiny vintage lens quite solid build that is pretty light and compact. The images are very "cheap"-looking. You'll see that this lens is well beyond what the $300 Nikon "kit" lens contains. Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR - Lensora This lens is great given the price factor. Even a fellow Minolta owner disagrees with you. The AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED also incorporates proven Nikon features and technologies such as the SWM, which offers quiet and smooth autofocusing, and one ED glass element that provide higher resolution and high-contrast images. offer instant manual focus override: you have to move a switch, but lens distortion filter. See also Crop Factor. Sharpness is not that bad,nor is contrast or even color at f/8-f/11. For this kind of lens, VR may come really handy at most situations. His results show poor corners at 100mm even stopped down, that is not the case with this lens based on my use of it as shown in the sample in the gallery I uploaded. All shot in raw and processed in C1 and sometimes PS. Not surprisingly, chromatic aberration is better controlled on the Nikon, vignetting is better on the Tamron, and distortion is similar between the two lenses. As is the case with many modern AF lenses though, the price for this fairly fast AF performance is a relatively limited amount of travel on the manual focus ring, making manual focus a bit touchy. When buying expensive things, the first question one should always ask is "Yeah, but do i really need it?" The 55-200 VR II has about the usual amount of flare and ghosts, which means you'll never see any unless you walk out in the noonday sun, hide behind a tree, and let the full blinding disc of the sun shine out, then expose for the tree and see what happens. a tripod. Photography is all about having fun versus making it a competition. Dimensions: 71x83mm Maximum magnification ratio: 0.23x If you're considering the Nikon D5100, these sample images should give you a good idea of the camera's image quality in various real-world situations. Why don't you post some links to full resolution examples of your own photos with those photos? The 55-200mm VR II doesn't Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm F4-5.6G VR II sample photos - ExploreCams The 200mm F/2.0 Lens | 15 Photos That Will Make You Need One - SLR Lounge Light falloff in the corners of the frame is quite pronounced when shooting wide open across the entire focal length range, decreasing more or less linearly as you stop down; falling to about 1/4 EV two stops down, and 1/10 EV or less at three stops below maximum aperture. I would concede that they're perhaps slightly less cost effective than Canon's stuff, but only slightly, and that difference is probably attributable almost entirely to volume and the reality of economy of scale for Fuji. Nikon does not seal its boxes, so never buy at retail or any source not on my personally approved list since you'll have no way of knowing if you're missing accessories, getting a defective, damaged or used lens, a customer return or if the warranty has already been registered to someone else online! If these prices are representative of Fujis lenses in general then in a substantial number of cases Fuji shooters are being taken to the cleaners. It obviously wont' do anything about blur caused by subject motion, but the ability to reduce the effects of camera shake can make a big difference when shooting under limited lighting, particularly at telephoto focal lengths. If you want to focus by hand, set it to "M" for manual focus and turn the front ring yourself. The flowers are not all in focus, only two of them are. The 100-200 really isn't in the same class as this lens. This enables high-speed autofocusing that's extremely accurate and super quiet. It seems really well made for such a low price lens. Portrait and landscape lens. It's also very compact and light. The Fuji has a serious loss of contrast at 200mm, that is quite clear and I think it's too expensive for what it is. The stabilisation even seems better on the Fujithe Nikon seems to be not overly effective. The review I found look reasonably executed and even another person (@Combatmedic870) in this thread vouched that the review was legitimate. Nikon professional user. Stopped down to f/8, both lenses perform well, but the Nikon is still sharper across the frame; at the telephoto end, the Nikon is a fairly uniform 2 blur units across the frame, while the Tamron is sharper at the center, but hits highs of 4 blur units in the corners. lenses. So why do so few photographers own this lens? I didn't like the fact, that it is all plasticky, and also a long Zoom, the Canon STM and the Fuji XC. Sorry for convenience but with these lenses I got what is lacking Sample Photos! If you want razor sharp low light performance, buy faster and bigger glass. That is, you should be able to shoot at shutter speeds four times slower than whatever level you need to get sharp handheld shots without VR. But if you break it, buy another one. Compatibility back to intro back to top. Fisheye 0 matches. As with the autofocus system, the 7-blade aperture diaphragm is controlled mechanically by Nikons conventional lever, further extending compatibility with older cameras. VR is all well and good, but how does well does this lens perform its main task, namely delivering sharp, distortion-free images? Now that I have learned (I think) the peculiarities of this lens I find myself much happier with its performance. (view a larger photo) As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and f/8. 1/4000s 116mm f/4,5. The AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED has been specifically designed to complement the D80 as well as the upcoming D40 and D40x cameras. While we did find this lens a little tweaky to focus manually, it was otherwise a very nice-handling optic. We offer you to match any camera and lens to see if they are compatible or not. Monday, 05 January 2015, 11:59 PM NYC time. Must have been a glitch from posting from mobile. Good question, I'd be happy to explain. Zooming is a blast, since 3/4 of the lens is all zoom ring. @Raynaud although the Sony 55-210 is not as good (great) as my FE70-300G, I used it on my Sony 5T for many years, and it did a decent job for me.https://grob.smugmug.com/5T/In good light, for the size, weight, price, it got me interested in MILC's. Your screenname belies your bias Maxxum Fan (i.e. It didn't help that the foreground was generally underexposed for the scene due to the bright sky. I wouldn't say it's sharp either. - Nikon 180mm 2.8 ai-s ED 200$ I use it on my D5500 and it's a great deal for the money.I also use the Canon 70-300mm/4.5-5.6 II on an 80D. I am not sure, that was good change, because the IQ seemed to me the same (except vignetting is more visible with 55-200). Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED AF-S DX Nikkor ~$170 Both of the standard and telephoto zooms have a similar space-saving retractable design but, unlike the latest 'AF-P' versions of the 18 . This 3.6x zoom, designed exclusively for use with Nikons DX-format D-SLR cameras, features Nikons VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization and is perfect for portraits and action. By clicking Sign Up, you are opting to receive promotional, educational, e-commerce and product registration emails from Nikon Inc. You can update your preferences or unsubscribe any time. Sharpness really surprised me too; it is sharp wide open untill say 150 mm. (purchased for $280), reviewed June 3rd, 2007 Nowadays I mostly shoot a pocket Canon with CHDK. If you need macro ability.then why don't you buy a macro lens like the Fuji 80mm 2.8???? AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor ED 55-200mm F4-5.6G, Nikon Authorized Dealers - Sport Optics (PDF), Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. it's very light, yet very comfortable to handle. Their last effort the 16-80mm was shockingly poor, heck even the old A mount Zeiss would tear that up even with sub par build. Its like comparing a Nikon 70-300mm lens to a 70-200mm f4 lens. At the moment I decided to live with it since it's still functional. I got this lense for a few months a than I changed it for 70-300 VR. Real world use always reveals more about a lens. You say Kurt Munger image samples are not to be trusted can you link to your own library of photos taken with the Minolta 100-200 to support your claims? Initially I bought a 70-300 VR to complement my 18-70. It's also the same size as the excellent 35mm f/1.8 and 18-55mm lenses that are deservingly popular on DX cameras. For the crazy low price it sells at it's a bit of a gem actually. Cons: vignetting if is not stopped down, plastic mount, shorter than 70-300 VR :-) I read about this lens in a Pop Photo article "Must buy bargain." i need this lens for all around shooting, but i have been thinking about how much i would like to photograph the moon. I may have made the wrong choice. Distortion: Theres minor barrel distortion at 55mm, virtually no distortion at 75mm and just a little pincushion at longer focal lengths. 55 min ago Hi, I recently purchased a Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens. Nikon Z 50-250mm VR Review - KenRockwell.com Lens construction: 13 elements in 9 groups That being said looking at the dpreview gallery of the Fuji 55-200mm it's about what I thought it should be for a lens of that type (not that I'm going to buy it). For the crazy low price it sells at it's a bit of a gem actually.". LCD, Video and Photo Gallery images are for illustrative purposes only. It begins on the low side of moderate at 55mm, drops to truly low levels through the middle of its focal length range, and then rises to the high side of moderate at 200mm. By the way the field of view of my Nikon 180mm is probably equal to what would be 240mm on the 55-200mm vr. Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II: Price Comparison, We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices. An ideal lens for sports, people and school events, this lens provides clear images with less blur. It pops in a pocket and I'm good to go. Lateral chromatic aberration shows up at both ends of the zoom range, towards the edges and corners of the image frame, when uncorrected in-camera, as with early Nikon DSLRs. It has big zoom ring & very easy to handle. Still as I mentioned no/limited autofocus is kind of a deal breaker most people on non-Sony/Minolta camera systems. 2015 KenRockwell.com. A-M stands for Auto-Manual Mode. This issue may be better on modern Nikon cameras. Piles of garbage outside a McDonalds restaurant, Canon EOS Rebel T7 + Canon EF 16-35mm f/2,8 L USM, Canon EOS Rebel XTi + Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5,6 L IS USM, Nikon D300s + Canon EF TS-E 24mm f/3,5 L II, Nikon D300s + Nikon AF 105mm f/2,8 D Micro-Nikkor. Sometimes you are better off without the VR on (especially if you are not required to track your subject) since it may cause some image blur. On my good old D70, the AF becomes slow in the long tele range. Unlock your creative vision and your camera's full potential with over 90 Nikkor lenses-each optimized to deliver stunning results across a variety of applications. For those seeking an affordable, versatile all-in-one zoom lens for their DX-format DSLR camera, the AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm is a great choice. The price of this lense is really better than it's longer brother and if you don't mind it is shorter, you will be satisfied. Filters, Use with performance top. Look at the sample photos. Yes I did upload a shot at 100mm F5.6 I've shot it on FF and APS-C and his results at 100mm have no bearing at all to the lens I have with me. (purchased for $300), reviewed May 1st, 2007 I don't know about way sharper this corner for the Minolta at 100mm looks pretty bad from this review. That's a blur that's easily noticeable when compared against the best lenses we've tested, but is as good as that of many lenses likely to be considered by even relatively well-heeled amateur shooters. Click here to get back to Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR . Nikon calls this the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II. Stopping it down will help a little at 200 mm. I moved to Olympus about three years ago and their Pro lenses, 12+40, 40-150, and 12-100 are excellent for close focus. See camera and lens details. Yes affordable is relative, I agree. Comparison with all possible options would thus be a rather tedious process, so we'll restrict our discussion here to a subset of the alternatives that we've tested. Is a photography book really a book without a fancy launch party? Click on the image you want to know more about. (And again, recent versions of Photoshop make it fairly easy to correct even significant amounts of geometric distortion.). Gathered in this post is a compilation of annotated links to Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor reviews, feedback, user opinions, sample photos, tests, image galleries, pictures and other references and resources. The tests also measure distortion and color fringing (chromatic aberration). Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II review The color is good very cool , a bit too cold for my taste , though. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I bought mine when I bought an X-E1 + 18-55 as a backup to my Nikon outfit in 2014. The VR does not work or much less effective than the IS on my Canon lenses. Read More This entry was posted in Nikon Lens and tagged Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II , Sample Image on January 6, 2015 by admin . Lol compare to Minolta 100-200mm F4, smaller, lighter FF compatible and way sharper with better bokeh ;-D Oh and it's a ton cheaper. You might be sincere in trying to evaluate Fuji lenses or no ast you seem to also have done similar things in Canon and Nikon forms while at the same time again bragging about your vintage Minolta lenses. I was not happy with the dark blue fringing of the 70-300 vr and expected to see some in this lens too, well .. there is almost none!! Sticker glued into a recess on the bottom of the lens. That's a noticeable amount of pincushion, but not more than we've seen in many other lenses we've tested in the past. camera-original file. (296.2g) actual measured weight. Shop by use, price, telephoto or wide angle options, and more. I have a similar technical issue with the Fuji 14mm; in all shooting modes except shutter priority, when changing f stops, it jumps from 5.6 to f22.
2010 Ford Fusion Grill,
Carlisle Trac Chief Lawn & Garden Tire 18x8 50-10,
Black Cashmere Joggers Women's,
Royal Canin Hypoallergenic Cat Treats,
Articles N